A good metric is comparative. Being able to compare a metric to other time periods, groups of users, or competitors helps you understand which way things are moving.
A good metric is understandable. If people can’t remember it and discuss it, it’s much harder to turn a change in the data into a change in the culture.
A good metric is a ratio or a rate.
Exploratory metrics are speculative and try to find unknown insights to give you the upper hand, while reporting metrics keep you abreast of normal, managerial, day-to-day operations.
Leading metrics give you a predictive understanding of the future; lagging metrics explain the past.
If you find a causal relationship between something you want (like revenue) and something you can control (like which ad you show), then you can change the future.
Quantitative data abhors emotion; qualitative data marinates in it.
Whenever you look at a metric, ask yourself, “What will I do differently based on this information?” If you can’t answer that question, you probably shouldn’t worry about the metric too much.
change favors local maxima; innovation favors global disruption.
When you know what the right question is, you’ll know what metric to track in order to answer that question.
failure that comes from planned, methodical testing is simply how you learn. It moves things forward in the end. It’s how you avoid big-F Failure.
Whatever your current OMTM, expect it to change. And expect that change to reveal the next piece of data you need to build a better business faster.
Sergio Zyman, Coca-Cola’s CMO, said marketing is about selling more stuff to more people more often for more money more efficiently.[
If you look at the repurchase rate on a 90-day cycle, it becomes a very good leading indicator for what type of e-commerce site you have. There’s no right or wrong answer, but it is important to know whether to focus more on loyalty or more on acquisition.